[flagged]
Surely you have data ready for peer review that contradicts this group of scientists?
Remember when the rivers were too dried up in France for the nuclear plants to function? Then everyone said that due to climate change we'd soon have an arid climate in Germany.
So, according to "peer reviewed data", we go from an arid 2020 to rain forest 2024 in just four years due to climate change. Remarkable.
Yes, it is a remarkable behavior of complex systems like weather, but we see it in all complex systems as they spin out of control.
“You say the vehicle crashed by veering off the right hand side of the road, but in this video we see the car wildly veering from left to right across 6 lanes of traffic multiple times first! Remarkable!”
Think of a bell curve, with growing standard deviation.
Look at this table for example: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_von_Hochwasser-Ereigniss...
Seems like people either started documenting more or there are more floods now.
There are always been floods. But now they get worse. How much worse ? I don't know.
And as another HNer said, land management has its part in this too...
From the OP: "But if warming reaches 2C, similar episodes will become an extra 5% more intense and 50% more frequent, the WWA warned."
Countless prior models were completely off, but this one is suddenly correct and needs to be treated as a reliable predictor.
The problem is that if you dare to question the accuracy, you are immediately labeled a "denier." The only acceptable answer is that no matter what the prediction is, if it is alarmist, it is correct.