You don't want to find ways to reduce (or eliminate) taxes, without any negative side effects?
You wouldn't approve of a way to deliver vaccinations that hurts less than a needle? (Personally I don't mind it, but some people do.)
You wouldn't approve of finding a way to let people travel faster? One without negative side effects, of course.
You seem to be advocating for the status quo, and denying improvement is possible.
Deleted comment
Deleted comment
Deleted comment
I don't say this to insult you. I say it because problems have solutions. That is what you seem to be trying to deny. You want to say this thing went wrong, and therefore children must be hurt, it's inevitable, and trying to prevent it is crazy. I take the view that when people are hurt, someone has made a mistake, and we can try to do better.
Deleted comment
Deleted comment