Revenue from “marketing the 3d scans” is not the same as “revenue from selling replicas” and it is the latter that they are trying to protect, not the sale of the scans directly
My impression from that article was that '3D scans' and 'replicas' were grouped together.
Yes, I agree the article very intentionally tries to give that impression, true
Am I to understand that impression is incorrect then? Where might one look to ascertain the actual revenues involved?