No judge will ever rule on something based on a comment they read in the Internet.
https://innocenceproject.org/misapplication-of-forensic-scie...
It is dangerous to push the narrative that GenAI can "put information back" where it was once removed. Especially dangerous, because most GenAI is built to put something there that is extremely believable. And while an innocent comment on HN might not play the biggest role, the linked project claims exactly what it can - by definition - not do ("a PhotoDNA hash can be used to produce thumbnail-quality reproductions of the original image") and it looks scientific, too.
Needless to say, when people are so brainwashed that they are ready to pray to actual machines, decisions of those machines won't be questioned. It would just be inconvenient.