> Alex Jones was declared to be in default for failing to provide a document that never existed in the first place.

You've said this numerous times. It isn't true.

> In her ruling, Bellis criticized Jones’ attorney for providing only “sanitized, inaccurate” financial records and showed “callous disregard” for her repeated rulings to provide complete analytics data. She found Jones’ attorneys actions “were not just careful” but constituted “a pattern of obstructive conduct” requiring the most severe sanction of default, what she called a “last resort,” as reported by the Hartford Courant.

https://firstamendmentwatch.org/judge-finds-alex-jones-liabl...

It was for a pattern of behavior, not any single document. Speaking of patterns of behavior, you've now left three increasingly unhinged replies to my single comment. Whatever impression it is you're trying to create, I don't think it's working.

3 replies to a single comment, and you're doing this all over this thread. You're almost 10% of the comments here, and there's a lot of comments.

Might be good to take a step back for a few minutes/hours.

>>Lol... someone apparently accepted the mRNA injections.

It just boggles my mind that one of the greatest medical achievements of this century(so far anyway) is being ridiculed on the internet. It's honestly the same as someone going in the comments section and saying that the earth is flat, after all just LOOK OUTSIDE SHEEPLE.

Hey we're only writing what our overlords (bill gates etc) tell us to write over the vaccine antenna we got inserted.