Hacker News Reader

Comment by TZubiri | Hacker News Reader

[flagged]

The conclusion states that it is not a vulnerability.

> The sandbox is not a security flaw; it’s a deliberate, contained environment built to provide interactivity without risk.

Well, this is as far as legal could let me, I wish I could have published more. Part 2 of this blog was canceled seriously :)

Hence 'vuln' in quotes

Maybe it's more of a reading comprehension issue rather than a writing thing

Sorry, I was 'aware' that quotes worked as a negation operator.

https://youtu.be/6C4ZV4TW86g?si=6CR7eiHKjd0ygIzc

Less to do with formatting, more to do with writing quality (which is just... awful to read).

Hey can you provide me tips on how you would like to see writing like this, I'm all about feedback and improving to allow a wide range of readers. Usually I write really technical blogs and loose a lot of people. These blogs that cater to everyone assists individuals to understand from different industries. :)

I would appreciate feeback.

The AI-assisted writing is unfortunately really obvious and makes reading a bad experience. People learn to skim, and skimming AI-inflated text is made more painful because of how much fluff AI adds.

Hard disagree, you should be skimming anyways, always. No one reads sequentially.

You just saw 'delve' and automatically classified it as ai generated.

It's so painfully obviously AI-written, I'm shocked you're defending it right now.

Look at the "Implications of Instruction Extraction: Benefits and Security Considerations" section right now and tell me that isn't the most awfully obvious AI drivel in the world. If you cannot see that, I worry for your reading comprehension.

Could not agree more

No one reads sequentially? You can't be serious

Reply on news.ycombinator.com