This appears to be the source of the backlash:
> Andrew Tomazos submitted P3403, a paper titled “The Undefined Behavior Question” (which HOOBOY man we’re just knocking it out of the fucking park with possible anti-semitic dog whistles today aren’t we?)
Riiiight. To be fair apart from that their criticism of Tomasoz seems relatively justifiable, if unnecessarily angry. Tomasoz has said that "almost noone" has ever written anything productive in Rust, which is a stupid thing to say. And he thinks ChatGPT is on par with humans now, which is also pretty obviously untrue.
Idiots all round.
No. Absolutely not. No reasonable person would consider the title to be that.
And their specific criticisms of the contributor this post is discussing, are very mild but full of personal attacks and expletives?
It argues that C++WG made various mistakes and full of incompetent members by presenting various seemingly technical topics but it's so random and unorganized it's hard to follow.
It doesn't make sense at all.
It started out interesting, but was simply a long rambling text where there seems to be no point
as a sibling comment said: "idiots all around".
or perhaps simply extremely bad at interpreting and handling social skills and emotions.
Do you have some information that would lead to doubt on Arthur's conviction?
Can you elaborate on what "sort of person" means exactly? Is that just to refer to people who point out that someone in a community has raped a child, been convicted of raping a child and is on a sex offenders register? Or some other category?
I think it's troubling that so many people in the replies are seemingly more offended over some swear words than the literal rape of a child.