"Would you trust wikipedia as much if it had a page for your neighbor's dog?"
Why wouldn't I?
Plus, as long as they maintain the "no original research" rule and the citation requirement, this isn't even a potential problem.
Why wouldn't I?
Plus, as long as they maintain the "no original research" rule and the citation requirement, this isn't even a potential problem.
> Plus, as long as they maintain the "no original research" rule and the citation requirement, this isn't even a potential problem.
Thousands of articles are published everyday. Its not difficult to get in one. So and so got an honorable mention at the town's local pet show.
The users want it to be different, the users want Inclusionism. It's going to happen, with them or with whatever comes after them.
Wikipedia is better off getting in front of that parade and leading it rather than being run over by it.