It would be interesting if in the future mathematicians are just as fluent in some (possibly AI-powered) proof verifying tool, as they are with LaTeX today.
It would be interesting if in the future mathematicians are just as fluent in some (possibly AI-powered) proof verifying tool, as they are with LaTeX today.
More problematic with that statement is that a timeline isn’t specified. 1 year? Probably not. 10 years? Probably. 20 years? Very likely. 100 years? None of us here will be alive to be proven wrong but I’ll venture that that’s a certainty.
I will agree that it's likely none of us here will be alive to be proven wrong, but that's in the 1 to 10 year range.
I don’t see how my position is so exceptionally strong. I’m saying indeed there’s a 55-70% probability that this happens in the 1-10 year time frame. At 1-20 it goes up to 70-90%. It’s still important to leave room for doubt that we might miss something or be unable to build something for a long time. Trying to state otherwise seems like an even stronger position to take to me.
Here it means do math research or better, find new math.