E.g.:
1. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/romania-detects-another...
2. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/polish-army-says-object...
3. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/russian-drone-debris-found-in-r...
E.g.:
1. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/romania-detects-another...
2. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/polish-army-says-object...
3. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/russian-drone-debris-found-in-r...
Incidentally, Russia is behaving in roughly the same way; they talk a lot of shit about, for instance, western weapons being used against targets in Russian territory, but then when that happens anyway they issue more threats instead of starting WW3 in earnest like they threatened before. They don't really want that war either; if they did they're able to start it anytime they want, but they've got kids too.
I'd argue we crossed it around 2014.
It was trying to be reasonable and avoid/manage conflict with a fundamentally unreasonable ‘partner’.
The unwillingness to take a stand and make a credible threat of nuclear exchange unless Russians get out of Ukraine has only invited further attacks on Europe. In practical terms, the foolish "escalation management" serves no other purpose than giving the initiative to Russians. By knowing that NATO will try to defuse any dangerous situation, they can safely keep tuning the temperature to their liking. The most level-headed people have warned about this for a long time.
They are not particularly level headed, unless level headed has changed meaning to "stupid".