It's almost as revealing as "Yikes, there's a lot of issues to unpack there. Top of mind is the absence of guardrails around inappropriate language and metaphor."
Quite how we've reached the point where political persuasions are linguistically distinct I have no idea.
Just look at how their usage is promoted in this thread to defeat supposed evils elsewhere in the language.
What I said is it is a sign of language policing, and that means a sign of the sort of people that like to deliberately misinterpret things so they get to be offended and virtue signal about the response. Normal people, unlike myself, simply shut up as a defence mechanism.
There's actually nothing wrong with the existing generally used words.
I'd be legitimately surprised if you know at this point.