There is an argument to be made that ChatGPT mildly rewording/misquoting info directly from my blog is copying.
OpenAI would be the company actually committing the infringement and providing the copy in order to satisfy the request.
If the law suddenly worked the other way around, companies would no longer be able to prosecute people for hosting pirated content online, because the responsibility would lie with the users choosing to initiate the download.
Legally, you'd struggle to prove any form of infringement happened. Making a copy is fine. Distributing copies is what infringes. You'd need to prove that is happening.
That's why there aren't a lot of court cases from pissed off copyright holders with deep pockets demanding compensation.