And the second level, for some reason, includes (among others) a bunch of countries that would normally be seen as close US allies - e.g. some NATO countries (most of Central/Eastern Europe).
Which apparently might be a good outcome to FOSS operating systems, with national distributions like Kylin.
As European I vote for SuSE.
These folks aren't "forced" to provide "cheap brainpower:" they are offering services at their market rate.
This might be a product of the USA being a gerontocracy.
Yeah, this is really a bit insulting.
> Yeah, this is really a bit insulting.
So you're insulted some country of other wasn't included in:
> First, this rule creates an exception in new § 740.27 for all transactions involving certain types of end users in certain low-risk destinations. Specifically, these are destinations in which: (1) the government has implemented measures to prevent diversion of advanced technologies, and (2) there is an ecosystem that will enable and encourage firms to use advanced AI models to advance the common national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and its allies and partners.
?
IMHO, it's silly to get insulted over something like that. Your feelings are not a priority for an export control law.
Taiwan, even though it's a US ally, is only allowed limited access to certain sensitive US technology it deploys (IIRC, something about Patriot Missile seeker heads, for instance), because their military is full of PRC spies (e.g. https://www.smh.com.au/technology/chinese-spies-target-taiwa...), so if they had access the system would likely be compromised. It's as simple as that.