Is the difference that a massive objective hitting you would typically do damage via the electromagnetic force?
But if you consider the gravitation force of the pyramids obviously that's extremely weak compared to the other forces on our body, so we shouldn't expect it to do damage in the same way?
[1]: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=schwarzschild+radius+ca...
[2]: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=%28red+blood+cell+size%...
Locally, the black hole would swallow any atoms it comes into contact with and would probably scatter nearby molecules, but that's it. It'd pass straight through you.
(Forgive the layman's attempt at understanding)
If Bob is floating in space in a capsule, and a very heavy asteroid floats past, the amount that Bob's capsule is moved is dependent on the speed of the asteroid?
Does that sort of thing have to be considered when planning the orbits of probes etc?
Is Earth traveling fast enough, from the viewpoint of Alice floating near the sun, to have a gravity "tail" or "wake" trailing after it? (Alice near the sun thing is my attempt at a mostly static observer) And of course due to relativity, if Alice was orbiting retrograde to the big heavy object, she'd observe even more effect?
I think I need about 6 more cups of tea before I can think about this!
Yes
> Does that sort of thing have to be considered when planning the orbits of probes etc?
Yes, it's a primary concern when sending probes to other planets
> Is Earth traveling fast enough, from the viewpoint of Alice floating near the sun, to have a gravity "tail" or "wake" trailing after it?
If I understand you correctly, then classically (i.e. ignoring relativity), no. Your gravitational acceleration towards the earth depends only your distance to it. If you consider general relativity? It's... complicated.
More likely, it would go straight through most atoms without interacting with them. They are tiny and move very fast, if you do the math the likelihood of direct, non-gravitational interactions with matter are somewhere near neutrinos, of which trillions passed through you while reading this sentence.
When one does end up eating something, the most significant effect is probably that it wouldn't eat the whole atom, but either just the nucleus, freeing all the electrons, or just an electron, leaving the atom positively charged.
Would it be capable of doing that? If the radius of the event horizon is significantly smaller than the radius of a proton, would it be capable of swallowing a proton (and how)?
Yes. PBHs, if they exist, have been constrained to asteroid mass ranges, and at the 10^17g the author concludes would be harmful, their radius would be 0.15 femtometers, or about 1/5 the radius of a proton. Combine that with galactic orbital speeds, and it's just too small and too fast to leave a mark, unless the mass is multiple mountains worth.