How is an exploration of broad spectrum legislative attacks on all forms of encryption regardless of hosting and corporate ownership and data communication moot?
Maybe that doesn't concern you though, and that's fine. Apple is always looking for customers that don't care that much about their devices.
Is there a particular reason you don't want to discuss the EU working group which is what I posted in response to your comment.
I didn't even dive in to how your original comment doesn't make sense to me. How do you think the DSA would help or change anything regarding either.
If you want to turn this into a relativist pissing contest, be my guest. I think it's a moot point, since the United States is complicit in an even more heinous form of surveillance. Don't moralize to me when America refuses to lead by example, this is the precedent that we set.
For a start the vector is very different. And I don't doubt there are unknown other attacks. But I'm discussing attacks we know about because they put them in policy papers and legislation.
Absurd discussion