Sending war plans around on signal to mobile phones guarantees that the information is reviewed outside of a SCIF. So what's the significance of pointing out that a SCIF is a place and not a network?
Further, one of the members of the group chat was in Russia at the time, because he's the special envoy to Russia, which means that the communication was likely viewed visually by cameras if he were to open the signal chat on his phone.
It's hard to understand this level of incompetence from supposedly "senior" people that are running our government. I would hope that any company would fire people like this immediately. But because they are politicians, they are apparently unfirable.
(And this is entirely ignoring the only reason we know this is going on, that they added a journalist to the chat, one that they claim is particularly unreliable, further damaging the opsec credibility of the politicians.)