There are no published facts aside from this guys missing, so there can be no adequate accounting of the facts.
You've misused Occam's Razor.
You've misused Occam's Razor.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_maximum_entropy
That was known at the time of my post.
We now also know now at the time of his escape, Indiana University had terminated his Professorship. And has continued to disavow he and his wife.
I did not misuse Occam's razor, my knowledge of public facts simply exceeded yours.
Occam's razor requires an adequate accounting of the facts, not speculation.
All you have mentioned is speculation, and the facts you have mentioned don't support this narrative, neither when you first mentioned it, nor now.
You misused it, and trying to falsely justify that you didn't is deluding yourself.