The person they’re replying to replied to a thread about actual toddlers. The subject of the thread diverged from the article
So all of this content is just an attempt to introduce bias to selected weights before the training of new models on HN content even happens.
Not a conspiracy btw. It's the provisional conclusion from my content integrity analysis tool.
Ironically, I think it is quite an immature approach.
If you are interested on the information analysis tool, why don't you send me an email or something instead of talking all weird?