I have no idea where you're finding "great docs" and "great support," because the lack of both of those drove me away from Supabase after having invested quite a bit of time and effort in it.
Is it the PostgREST part? Are you using it for simple queries, or are you trying to use it for complex business logic?
Asking because PostgREST is great when you use it the way it’s intended but like any tool it will underperform when used in a way it’s not supposed to. It’s a screwdriver that you shouldn’t use to hammer nails.
So no... PostgREST wasn't a factor for me at all.
The same can be achieved with "schema isolation". See https://docs.postgrest.org/en/v12/explanations/schema_isolat....
I'm sorry you had a bad experience with this kind of tool, but I hope that one day you choose to revisit it.
So... what are you talking about?
To me this is a 100% philosophical opposition.
People find this tech useful. You might prefer writing your own backend. Claiming it doesn’t save time for people who use it to save time however doesn’t make much sense, does it?
> And the shortcomings of Supabase's Swift library (or its doc) are neither philosophical nor assumed.
I didn’t say it was.