> Scaling the onboarding of new Wikipedia volunteers with guided mentorship.

Depending on what's meant by "mentorship": this is the bit I'm most keen to see. Much of the criticism lobbed at Wikipedia nowadays seems to come from how much of a pain it is to contribute (which perhaps leads to second-order criticisms about censorship, even if that's not the intention).

It's often been the case that the person most-worthy to speak on a subject is not the most worthy steward of a Wikipedia page on it. Any attempt to make those two people one-and-the-same seems welcome.

If this "mentorship" takes the form of UI hints, I think they'd go a long way. Having volunteers take an AI course, on the other hand, might be useful but might also be a complete waste of time.