Wikipedia is a good place to start getting a feel for the possible history of the Solar System:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter#Formation_and_migratio...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter#Internal_structure
> This has resulted in the theory that Jupiter does not have a solid core as previously thought, but a "fuzzy" core made of pieces of rock and metallic hydrogen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juno_(spacecraft)#Scientific_r...
https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/jupiters-mag...
https://radiojove.gsfc.nasa.gov/library/sci_briefs/decametri...
The rotation of these features is the basis for the "system III" definition of longitude on Jupiter.
This is all a very traditional view afaik and doesn’t explain where mantle light elements come from. For example there is a great deal of water that is in the mantle that drives geochemical changes in the mantle rocks. Was that there originally? Or was it put their after plate tectonics started and subduction sucked water into the mantle? I don’t know but I would assume there are plenty of geodynamics people who would have opinions more deeper than mine on the topic.
Why would you assume that? The heavier elements such as iron are likelier to move to the center of gravity.
The heavier elements being formed in our sun now are going to stay there until something can tear it apart.
IIR, our sun's mass is far too low to ever create any element heavier than carbon.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/Jupiter_...
The four inner planets are all terrestrial. The four outer planets are gas (the last fwl sometimes distinguished instead as “ice”) giants.
There are dwarf planets (a separate category from, rather than sibcategory of, planets) closer and farther, but no known rocky planets beyond the gas/ice giants.
Though I agree that 2061 fell rather short of his usual.