> It’s a linguistic uncanny valley, close enough to human to be recognizable, but different enough to be repulsive.

I love this. It's exactly how I feel when I read AI-generated content. A little bit sick, not really sure why.

No, passing an inverse-turing test while writing can't be the goal.

The onus is on the reader to accept an argument; irrespective of source.

Writing, of any sort, can no longer be used as proof of 'written entirely by human'.