> There is no way that data will stay safe forever. There is no way that, once such a facility is built, it will not be used constantly, by governments all over the world.
That's on OpenAI for deciding to retain this data in the first place. They could just not have done that. That was a choice, their choice, and therefore they're responsible for it.
It's obviously 3 because the entire point of the NYT is that it's a newspaper and probably 99% of their traffic is from articles new enough that they haven't had time to go into the training data. So anybody who wanted to use ChatGPT to breach the NYT paywall couldn't get any new articles. Also there are so many other ways to breach a paywall that you would have to be insane to try to do it through prompt engineering ChatGPT. The whole case is a scam and I hope the court makes them pay OpenAI's legal fees.