30 lines are always going to be easier to read/write/debug than 3000 lines, so it'll probably remain easier (for both humans and machines) to write correct code in languages that make it possible to express ideas concisely and elegantly.
From elsewhere on the front page: "given choice between complexity or one on one against t-rex, grug take t-rex: at least grug see t-rex".
So you write everything in assembly then?
That is a false dichotomy. It is not 3000 versus 30. It's 3000 versus 2578 where the DSL is poorly documented by someone who long ago lost interest in maintaining it. I prefer the initial example in the article to the DSL equivalent. I can immediately read the non-DSL code and be productive. The DSL looks like a vanity project.