Hacker News Reader

I was not being serious, but as you've repeatedly said, there's no evidence for the argument you're making.

A three-month change at the beginning of the year in PM2.5 is noise.

I provided clear, reliably sourced evidence for it, while noting it's too early for that evidence to be conclusive yet.

You've yet to provide any for your assertions. Just feels.

Again, in case it's not clear: I was being whimsical. I'm obviously not resting my opposition to this on a one-off argument about dust in my apartment.

I personally don't think the PM2.5 thing would justify the implementation of the system even if it were true, but that's not a debate I want to get into.

https://x.com/dril/status/549425182767861760

> Again, in case it's not clear: I was being whimsical.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schrodinger%...

The benefits of reducing PM2.5 pollution are... not in dispute. https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-ef...

> https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schrodinger%...

I've been nothing but polite to you.

In the Southern belle “bless your heart” sense, perhaps. In the “good faith arguing” sense, no.

In the "I literally didn't insult you and call you names" sense.

I’d rather be called names than have some argue in bad faith.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com