> are they going to more important to the economy than humans?", then they have to be good at basically everything a human can do,

I really don’t think that’s the case. A robot that can stack shelves faster than a human is more valuable at that job than someone who can move items and also appreciate comedy. One that can write software more reliably than person X is more valuable than them at that job even if X is well rounded and can do cryptic crosswords and play the guitar.

Also many tasks they can be worse but cheaper.

I do wonder how many tasks something like o3 or o3 pro can’t do as well as a median employee.