Hacker News Reader

My thought as well. You could add notify commands to a temp table during the transaction, then run NOTIFY on each row in that temp table after the transaction commits successfully?

View on HN

This is roughly the “transactional outbox” pattern—and an elegant use of it, since the only service invoked during the “publish” RPC is also the database, reducing distributed reliability concerns.

…of course, you need dedup/support for duplicate messages on the notify stream if you do this, but that’s table stakes in a lot of messaging scenarios anyway.

Wouldn't you need to then commit to remove the entries from the temp table?

No, so long as the rows in there are transactionally guaranteed to be present or not, a sweeper script can handle removing failed “publishes” (notifys that didn’t delete their row) later.

This does sacrifice ordering and increases the risk of duplicates in the message stream, though.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com