https://www.lightningmaps.org/#m=ses;t=3;s=0;o=0;b=;ts=0;
triangulates lightning strikes detected by this method. Right now I see a front moving between the Triple Cities area and Scranton.
https://www.sparkfun.com/sparkfun-lightning-detector-as3935....
Looks like it's steadily increased, labor maybe? Just a WAG on my part to be sure, I'm too far away to legitimately speculate.
lots of products like this are increasing because nobody is running the older cheaper fabs
Everything I did failed and I have never been able to get anything other than noise out of these sensors at best. YMMV, as I know these chips have a history of problems but supposedly do actually work. After I finally gave up on these things I ended up getting an Acurite 06045M, a cheapo SDR dongle, and a Pi Zero W running rtl_433 for like $60 and that has worked perfectly for years and is fairly straightforward to plug into Home Assistant over MQTT. It very reliably detects strikes and gives a pretty good estimate of distance (but NOT bearing), plus you get an outdoor temp/humidity sensor for free.
I think the 06045M might actually use the AS3935 internally so presumably you can get them to work and when they do work they work very well, but nothing I could do as a (pretty advanced and well-equipped) hobbyist could make them work, and I've heard others had similar issues with them. So maybe stick to buying something commercial with it inside?
I've been mighty tempted to try again with a newer one as I really want to build a compact portable lightning sensor linked to Meshtastic but I dread going through the whole ordeal again.
This probably isn't directly helpful but I found it a fun trail to follow for a bit.
[1] https://www.blitzortung.org/Documents/TOA_Blitzortung_RED.pd...
Can somebody provide clarity on if any of the boards really work?
It seems that bri3d has faith in the ScioSense.
If you want to know more specifically you need to have separate sensors that have with reasonably synchronized clocks so they can trilaterate or triangulate strike locations. Those sensors probably need to be further away from each other than most boats allow for. The further away the sensors are from each other, the tighter the time synchronization between them, and the more sensors you have will determine the overall accuracy your system will be able to attain.
I don't think that's feasible. These sensors work by detecting radio waves which propagate near the speed of light. Even if you had two sensors separated by 1 km, they'd both receive the radio signal within ~3 µs of each other. I don't think the sensors guarantee detection time to that level of precision, nor that it's feasible to keep clocks sufficiently synchronized that you can timestamp events at a sub-microsecond level.
With triangulation you only need the clocks accurate enough to correlate the events. This will largely be determined by the rate you see events, and you only need to distinguish specific events if you want to differentiate locations of individual strikes as opposed to a storm front. For a boating case you probably only care about the location of a storm front.
Two sensors measuring angles from a couple dozen meters apart can get you a pretty precise location of storm front especially when aggregating results from multiple detections.
Synchronizing multiple receivers is common. That's how passive ADS-B locators work.[1][2] This works so well there have been attempts to stamp it out.