Hacker News Reader

> Dickens' sentence structure was just as difficult to parse then as it is now

This is nonsense. Dickens was an enormously popular writer with common readers.

How are these statements contradictory?

They aren't. A run-on, 70 word sentence for example wasn't easier to store in your head, or not require the occasional second read-through back then . Readers then still had to go through all of that. This "it's just outdated" idea is employed primarily to hand-wave poor literacy performance and reading requirements.

Gravity's Rainbow came out in 1973 and has a lot of the same difficulty, but people don't call it 'outdated' or treat it like a foreign language. These are just books you have to read slower than a news article, and that's alright, but there's a fine line between needing more time and not being able to get through it. That study showed it conclusively.

Because readers at the time didn't struggle with it as they do now.

Yes, he was popular, and his works still weren't as easy to read as some of his contemporaries and many authors before and after him. That's not nonsense, that's reality.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com