https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2024/01/is...
In particular, the quote is apposite given the attack Israel had suffered just 2 weeks prior.
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/07/1211133201/netanyahus-referen...
Especially the correction (italics are my own and added to contrast your view with that of those who disagree with your interpretation):
> [POST-BROADCAST CORRECTION: This interview incorrectly says a quote from a speech that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave on Oct. 28 refers to the Amalekites from the biblical Book of Samuel. The prime minister’s office added a citation to his written and translated remarks to indicate Netanyahu was quoting from the Book of Deuteronomy. Both stories call for the Israelites to completely eliminate their attackers. In the Book of Deuteronomy, the text reads “blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven.”
At the time half of jewish israelis said outright in polls that they supported genocidal actions by the israeli state (p. 5 https://en.idi.org.il/media/21835/war-in-gaza-public-opinion...).
Also Israel officialy had "mowing the lawn" doctrine that is literal genocide
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2025.2...
“Technically correct, the worst kind of correct”.
It's not a technical distinction. People should stop bringing up the Amalek thing. Virtually everyone who cites it has no idea what it's a reference to. Given the gravity of everything that has happened since 2023, it's a pointless diversion. Any argument you want to make, you can make without this.