I've been calling it AI-assisted development, but that's clearly not snappy enough.

I have a few problems with evolving "vibe coding" to mean "any use of LLMs to help write code:

1. Increasingly, that's just coding. In a year or so I'll be surprised if there are still a large portion of developers who don't have any LLM involvement in their work - that would be like developers today who refuse to use Google or find useful snippets on Stack Overflow.

2. "Vibe coding" already carries somewhat negative connotations. I don't want those negative vibes to be associated with perfectly responsible uses of LLMs to help write code.

3. We really need a term that means "using prompting to write unreviewed code" or "people who don't know how to code who are using LLMs to produce code". We have those terms today - "vibe coding" and "vibe coders"! It's useful to be able to say "I just vibe-coded this prototype" and mean "I got it working but didn't look at the code" - or "they vibe-coded it" as a warning that a product might not be reviewed and secure.