The workplace is not supposed to be an unwilling audience for your reeducation campaigns.
That's the point, really, discussing politics at work is like discussing religion at work.
WTF?
> that any and all discussion on things you don't already agree upon is a "reeducation campaign"?
It literally is. Why else would you want to proselytise a certain PoV to someone who doesn't share that view unless you wanted them to change their view?
When JWs[1] come to your door, from their PoV, they are "just disucssing things". From your PoV they are annoying you.
You need to make a convincing argument why you attempting to "just discuss things" is different to a JW attempting to "just discuss things".
From where the rest of us are, we see no difference. Show us that difference.
-------------------------------
[1] Jehova's Witnesses
It seems like we're in agreement then. Why comment if you agree?
Then leave the less important thing if you want to do the more important thing.
After all, nothing is stopping you from doing the politics outside of work.