I'm still confused. What would they sue over? A qwerty keyboard? A rectangular monitor? Having a silvery stand? What?
I've looked at the two pictured presented and I don't see anything similar besides standard design choices.
I've looked at the two pictured presented and I don't see anything similar besides standard design choices.
A qwerty keyboard? A rectangular monitor? Having a silvery stand? What?
Surely you don't think that's the extent of the similarity, right? Nearly anyone that sees this machine and is familiar with the iMac is going to say "that looks like a copy of the iMac"; people don't say that about every machine with a QWERTY keyboard and a rectangular monitor on a silvery stand.
Yes I do. I don't see anything apple inspired here? Again, what would they sue over? Having a thin form factor?
How do you classify design choices as standard?