Sure mate, because taking a messy list of confusing statements and turning it into something like: "High risk of failure on re-entry - foam strike more than 600 times bigger than test data - test data unfit to support decision as flight condition is significantly outside of test database" requires a PhD in Materials Science.

If you can't effectively communicate how the results (or lack of results) of your research will impact the outcome of a high-stakes space mission you have no business being in that room from the start.

No PhD I know (several hundreds, in physics) would ever consider this slide remotely acceptable

Isn't this a stronger argument for making sure that things are communicated clearly?

PhD in what though?