Your comment is somewhat perplexing. The characterization of "unhinged lunatics" seems misapplied here, as it is difficult to overlook the fact that ICE itself has consistently demonstrated behavior that could reasonably be described in precisely those terms.

From family separations and indefinite detentions to systemic patterns of abuse and rights violations, the agency has engaged in conduct that undermines any claim to legitimacy or proportionality. To suggest that external actors are the destabilizing threat, while disregarding ICE's own record of cruelty and lawlessness, inverts the reality of the situation in a way that strains credulity.

Perhaps there’s a more precise way you could describe people who resist ICE, since labeling them "unhinged lunatics" makes your point less clear.