Imagine someone in 2006: "All these cynics and doomsayers about the US housing market are just envious and bitter that they didn't get in on the ground floor with their own investments."
Perhaps some were, but if we're going to start discounting opinions based on ulterior motives, there's a much bigger elephant in the room.
There is a degree of fraud in AI startups but not nearly to the degree there was in other boom/bust businesses like crypto. Even if AI progress were to stop now, the productivity benefits of existing LLM’s still haven’t fully spread.
But all of your comments seem to be dismissive of other people's opinions.
Among my disagreements was at replying to someone who said managers who change requirements due to AI should be shot and killed in the upcoming “revolution”
Before disagreeing with anyone I always try to consider their point as thoroughly as possible. However it is very often I am not given the same courtesy in return. However many people perpetually biased against AI interpret my disagreements far leas charitably than they would be regarding any topic they don’t have a bias towards.
Perhaps ask the AI to figure out quotes from humorist books for you?
> However it is very often I am not given the same courtesy in return
Having read your comments. No, you are incredibly dismissive of research and experiences and just treat your own feelings as an irrefutable mathematical proof.
Try asking a friend for their opinion on your commenting style if you don't believe me.