Ah, the IDF (or to use your own word: Jews), the righteous and moral people, who don't see the issue with dropping bombs on babies or starving them, because their enemy "started it".

What a great world to live in, if everyone behaved as morally as these IDF warmongers.

And I'd wager Israel would not stop inventing "terrorists" to kill even if Hamas surrenders.. if only it's a video game where we can save, see what happens with scenario A, and reload to the point where scenario A hasn't killed a few more tens of thousands of innocents as casually as in a relative clause of a sentence...

I want to find the article where a whistleblower said they'd lower the "threat rating" day by day depending on how many Palestinians they want to kill that day, but "IDF whistleblower" gives too many results...

But anyway, you won't be convinced, you've chosen your stance, and to change it means to admit you've been defending war crimes and genocide, and you'd rather construct your own complex reality (with all sorts of biases like confirmation bias) where you're right and I'm wrong, as long as it means you can convince yourself you remain a good and moral person...

No one is saying this is a genocide at the "hands of the Jews". Jews are not a monoculture, and while there are Jewish people involved in this genocide, this is clearly at the hands of the current state of Israel (and more specifically at the hands of the IDF).

Conflicts have rules, and Israel could absolutely have a conflict with Hamas (whom, it should be noted, I do not support) without eradicating the civilian population in Gaza.

There are plenty of military conflicts around the world. And arguably many war crimes committed by all parties. What the IDF is doing in Gaza is uniquely terrible, absolutely targets civilians, and much of the violence and harm perpetrated is wholly unrelated to defeating Hamas.