Hacker News Reader

Comment by mawise | Hacker News Reader

I met a guy a while ago who's passion was enabling self-hosting. His vision was to use an old android phone as a server--he ended up building a domain registrar[1] to facilitate OAuth-style flows for configuring DNS and an ngrok-style proxy[2] service that could configure DNS through said flow.

[1]: https://takingnames.io/ [2]: https://boringproxy.io/

View on HN

This is very cool. I have been thinking of a similar service that should exist.

Suppose you want to host your own email, or a mastodon server or similar. You download this application to your local computer. You pick what you want to install. It asks you which domain name provider you want to use, and which server host you want to use (eg. local or hetzner). It guides you into creating accounts for these services. Then uses their API, to set up the appropriate server, DNS settings etc.

It might not be fully automated, but something like this can seriously bring down the skill floor needed to host anything.

who's can also mean who has, which is where you've probably seen it used in ways that imply a possessive, but normally means who is, as https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45257167 indicated

Whose! Who's means who is

Further off-topic: You're not wrong, but maybe you should be. It's one of the most pointless irregular grammar rules in English. Nobody is ever confused by the wrong usage of the apostrophe here (when spoken there's no voicing of it). Native writers of English often get it wrong. If we had an Academy Anglaise we'd just regularise this usage. I give it 50 years max before possessive "who's" is considered correct (along with "it's").

> I give it 50 years max before possessive "who's" is considered correct (along with "it's").

"It's" is one I've struggled with a lot. I understand "It's" -> "It is" but my brain wants to add an "'s" for possessive-ness. It just feels more right. I'm been able to mostly break that bad habit but I still don't like it.

It's a strange rule. I'd be interested if any more serious grammarians can explain where this irregularity comes from.

Truman Capote would like a word /s

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4rrNKu5qp38

The weirdest thing about this is that eg “Pete’s” is correct. You can say “Pete’s over there” vs “Pete’s house is nice”, and the meaning is clear.

You guys really need an Academy Anglaise indeed! (I wasn't aware that does not exist before your comment)

The one that people get wrong all the time is "its" vs "it's" for exactly this reason. By the usual use of posessive apostrophe you would expect "it's" and yet that's only ever correct if you're eliding something (i.e. you mean "it is", "it has" etc.)

Honestly if we (in England) really had an institute of that kind we'd probably just end up formalising the weird spellings and grammar as being "right" instead of what we have now where our grammar rules are descriptive instead of prescriptive. Who knows how the differences with American, Indian, Australian, etc. dialects of English would be handled, but I'm sure we'd make a big mess of it somehow.

Edit: incidentally I now live in Sweden where there is such an institute, and they do seem (to my ignorant understanding) to make sensible updates to the dictionaries etc. to reflect actual modern pronounciation - but I'm still sure my homeland would figure out a way to mess it all up ;)

This is a class of errors I never made when I first learned English (mostly by reading/writing). My pronunciation was so bad that I pronounced these words differently.

It was a major milestone for me when I made my first its/it's mistake in writing :)

Whose cares

Reply on news.ycombinator.com