Hacker News Reader

I have a hard time believing that many indie artists are willing to pay $15/mo for access to a distribution platform with no traction with music purchasers or listeners. That's putting all the risk on them. I'd structure it more like "we get the first $15 of your earnings on our service each month".

That said, welcome competitor! I admire you guys taking a stab at this problem; it is one that needs solving.

View on HN

Thanks for the feedback :)

Hartley and I actually have some good connections in the music blogging space, and we're working on building some tools that we think will help artists and bloggers work together.

For example, right now bloggers either:

a) use an artist's embeddable player in order to post a song. They can't track plays/downloads coming from their site or their impact on an artist (I contributed 20% of their downloads, for example).

b) upload their own versions of audio files so that they can track plays/downloads. But now the artist can't see the reach of their music.

I think we can fix this.

So does that mean that you would sell access to the analytics data for a song listing to both the artist and the blogger? Would the blogger's data be limited to traffic on their own site? Does the artist control who gets access to their data?

Those are good questions, and ones we're also working through at the moment!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com