Hacker News Reader

Comment by rsynnott | Hacker News Reader

... Wait, how would the US government block ESA from launching stuff? ESA has its own rockets, which launch from its own facility and which are not drastically more expensive than Falcon 9 (this is a _fairly_ recent change; Ariane 5 was far more expensive than 6).

View on HN

> ESA has its own rockets, which launch from its own facility and which are not drastically more expensive than Falcon 9

ESA's launch cadence does not permit populating a LEO constellation. On this, currently, America has a monopoly. (Soon, I expect, to be shared with China.)

Developing a reusable launch vehicle is not needed for a fast launch cadence. The expendable Soyuz family has had 2006 launches since 1957 [1]. That's one in just over 12 days, and in reality, the cadence has been a lot faster at times (for long, continuous stretches).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_orbital_launcher...

> a reusable launch vehicle is not needed for a fast launch cadence

You're correct. But ESA isn't developing a mass-manufactured ELV, either. Themis is basically rebuilding Falcon 1, Prometheus a methalox Merlin.

Nothing ESA is doing generates launch independence from America (or China) in respect of LEO constellations or a war in space.

(That said, I think reusable super-heavy launch, e.g. Starship, will render both mass-manufactured ELVs and these Falcon 1/9 siblings obsolete.)

ESA has in the recent past used SpaceX rockets to deliver payloads. [0]

ESA now has the ability but my comment was specifically pointing out that ESA absolutely should have the independent ability to launch equipment.

https://www.satellitetoday.com/launch/2024/10/07/spacex-laun...

2nd amendment.

How does that help the European Space Agency?

A joke on how Americans use it to solve their problems, even ones studying from the 2nd amendment itself.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com