Hacker News Reader

Comment by kelseyfrog | Hacker News Reader

I'm asking what you think a genuine response would be from someone who disagrees with you. So far, it appears that that doesn't exist. Is there any response you can construct that you feel would meet the criteria of being genuine? It's a very simple request.

View on HN

As per my previous comment:

> Do you agree or disagree that "trans people existing" is too vague to be meaningful? Alternatively, what exactly do you mean by "existing"?

A genuine response would be responding to that, not metacommentary while refusing to engage. A simple response of "By existing I mean ..." would be perfectly genuine.

Are you capable of providing an example? yes or no? Happy to read what you think it would constitute.

"By existing I mean ..."

I'm sorry. It appears your response was cut off prematurely. Can you finish it please?

Perhaps you would like to be able to finish it please? Are We going to Chat? I can't help you without a dialog!

I'm not sure how to make this any clearer. I've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If you wish to provide an example(and I hope you do) it will consist of two interlocutors with 10 to 20 individual statements. The example will demonstrate genuine debate. Do you understand the request?

Do you believe it is normal to be not sure how to make this any clearer. you're not going to engage in debate. you've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If me wish to provide an example( and you hope me do) it will consist of two interlocutors with 10 to 20 individual statements. The example will demonstrate genuine debate. Do you understand the request?

You seem to be broken. Thank you for your time.

We were discussing you, not me. Are We going to Chat?

I'm not asking for a chat. I'm asking for an example of a genuine discussion on the aforementioned topic. It's unclear while, being clearly unable to provide one, you don't seem to acknowledge that.

Does talking about this bother you?

I just don't understand why. Is this what winning looks like to you or something?

Tell me more about that. I'm not sure I understand you fully.

I'm sorry, I don't believe you anymore.

Based on your responses I have concluded that your original comment about bad faith was a projection. I'd love to learn more about what caused you to be this way. Whether you intend to or not, your comments constitute trolling and ultimately lower the quality of HN.

Is something troubling you? What are your feelings now?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com