I’ve been starting with topics where I’m already familiar with the answer but want a refreshed. So far, I’m not impressed. Some times the info will be correct. Most of the time it strings together a lot of words from the material it finds but it reads like an undergrad trying to paraphrase the Wikipedia page without understanding the content. Often it will have one bullet point that is completely wrong.
The other problem I’m having is that it’s not very good at identifying poor sources. This is less of a problem with topics like math and engineering, but a big problem with topics like health and medicine where it will pick up alternative medicine and pseudoscience pages and integrate them into the research as if they were real. There are a lot of health and medicine topics where the way pseudoscience people talk about a subject doesn’t match the real science, but they use the same words and therefore catch the same search terms.
An example is the way “dopamine” is used in casual conversation and by influencers in ways that aren’t accurate. Concepts like “dopamine fasting” or claiming things “raise your dopamine” aren’t scientifically accurate but use the same words nevertheless and therefore can get pulled into the training set and searches.