> Nothing you're stating is empirically valid.

Oh, yes it is, there's history to learn from, just because you're unaware of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

> The framer has no valid framework.

If you understood the comment you replied to, you'd realize that "the framer" there refers to you, so your statement above means "mallowdram has no valid framework". Ironically, it's true - you lack a valid framework because you lack knowledge of logic, history and politics.