-> put Gemini 2.5 at the top of the pack

I have come to the same conclusion having built a workflow that has seen 10 million+ non-standardized PDFs (freight bill of ladings) with running evaluations, as well as against the initial "ground-truth" dataset of 1,000 PDFs.

Humans: ~65% accurate

Gemini 1.5: ~72% accurate

Gemini 2.0: ~88% accurate

Gemini 2.5: ~92%* accurate

*Funny enough we were getting a consistent 2% improvement with 2.5 over 2.0 (90% versus 88%) until as a lark we decided to just copy the same prompt 10x. Squeezed 2% more out of that one :D