The jury found that Trump committed acts that meet the common definition of rape and the definition of rape under the laws of most US states, but not the narrower definition of rape under New York's penal code, so it is not really a lie to say that Trump is a rapist as long as you are not saying that he was found liable in court for rape.
That's why E Jean Carroll can say Trump raped her and he has not been able to make her stop. She's speaking using the common usage of the word.
> You have to wonder why a ‘news’ source would make an edit like the Harris edit, don’t you?
Not really. As with most interviews they shot more material than would fit in the airtime available, so edited it down to fit. For one answer that they used in a preview clip during "Face the Nation" they used a longer version than they used for the interview segment on "60 Minutes".
Comparing both of these to the raw transcript of the full interview shows that the editing for neither the "60 Minutes" segment nor the "Face the Nation" preview changed the message or was deceitful or manipulative.
Trump lost the defamation case that actually went to trial making that exactly claim about E Jean Caroll's own use of the same language describing the result, the money he got from ABC wasn't because they were likely to lose at trial, it was because kowtowing to Trump was expected to have produce results for the corporate ownership when the Trump Administration considered licensing and other regulatory requests.
The obvious answer is because Trump does not fit the definition. Using that word was a lie, a $16m lie.
Dominion defamation case — A Delaware judge ruled it was “CRYSTAL clear” the Dominion 2020-election claims were false; Fox then settled for $787.5M. - https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=345820
Smartmatic defamation suit (ongoing) — New York appeals court let Smartmatic’s multibillion-dollar case proceed against Fox Corp in 2025; Smartmatic says Fox spread false claims about rigging the 2020 election. - https://www.reuters.com/legal/fox-must-face-smartmatic-27-bi...
“Biden is coming for your burgers” — Multiple Fox segments pushed a false claim that Biden’s climate plan limited red-meat consumption; Fox later issued an on-air correction. - https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-corrects-segment-on...
Misleading edit of Biden’s Satchel Paige remark — “Fox & Friends” aired a clipped video that removed context and made Biden’s Veterans Day comments seem racially insensitive; AP flagged the edit. - https://apnews.com/general-news-453bd99f1301f76b68368f0a5b2f...
Wrong clip during Harris interview — Bret Baier acknowledged he aired the wrong Trump clip while challenging Vice President Harris; AP covered the on-air “mistake” and correction. - https://apnews.com/article/harris-fox-news-bret-baier-mistak...
Hannity’s rally footage mix-up — After Jon Stewart called it out, Hannity apologized for using footage from a much larger 9/12 rally while discussing a smaller Bachmann event. - https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/2009/11/hannity-and-stew...
Misidentifying a Democratic lawmaker on-screen — Fox aired B-roll of Rep. John Conyers while discussing the indictment of Rep. William Jefferson, later issuing an apology. - https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-hosts-forced-make-on-air...
It looks like Fox edited a video to make it seem as if Biden made a racially insensitive statement. Fox says they made the edit for time constraints.
Seems weak compared to forging documents ( Dan Rather ), telling outright lies ( Stephanopoulos ), and failing to report a salient election issue ( Biden laptop ). I will grant that it seems similar to what the BBC did today, though.
The rest seem like slimy news tricks, but are not attacks of the same nature.