No, actual data for once, not just anecdotes.

I want to see more of that and less of the anecdotes. I’m under no illusion that this is any sort of conclusive test, but it’s a start. (This, for example, doesn’t test for POIs or more complicated and fuzzy search queries, which for me – anecdote alarm! – are the huge issue and both often unusable – while all the rest works like a charm for me, except for some small gripes I have with how maps are displayed.)

Isn't that ironic that you formed an opinion about an article that you didn't read?

I find it interesting that the linked article is substantiative and provides data and thought-out conclusions derived from the data, whereas you replied with a snarky 3 word response. That's much of Hacker News in a nutshell.