Hacker News Reader

Can you explain why I would pay almost the full price of Cursor, ChatGPT, or Claude again - just for your context layer, when these companies are already working on context?

I don't see you justify this with an explanation of the ROI anywhere.

View on HN

The economics are simple. When an agent guesses, it produces wrong code, failed runs, and wasted time. External context is the biggest source of those mistakes, because IDEs only index what’s in your repo. We are a complement to Cursor, ChatGPT, and Claude, not a replacement.

Just like with tool calling, I find models that are post-trained to work with a context system use it more reliably. I don't think bolting on a context system is ever going to work as well.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com