I entirely agree. People tend to run away from abstract math, with the impression that it's difficult. But the whole point is that a more abstract view of these things makes them easier to understand, not harder.
Whether or not someone is sufficiently motivated to study something should not affect their ability to understand it. Vector spaces and linear maps are actually much easier to understand, and I think that at some point in mathematics (probably your first analysis course) your motivation has to come from the beauty of the theory itself rather than some real-world application.
Should they deserve to starve like artists then?
Should taxpayers fund disciples (students) for them?
If yes, than should taxpayers be forced to fund students for any cult anyone wishes to start?
You deserve a round of applause!
(Also, mods, where are you?)