Why couldn't they use a local analytics system? Perhaps partner with one of the OS analytics like Piwik?
Edit: Um, I just looked, they don't appear to be using GA but a local system already?
Why couldn't they use a local analytics system? Perhaps partner with one of the OS analytics like Piwik?
Edit: Um, I just looked, they don't appear to be using GA but a local system already?
If it was a traditional software system that actually ran on the servers owned by the government then that would be fine.
With GA, at the very least Google get to know when I visit the site, and likely which pages I visit, simply through the requests my browser makes.
I'm not familiar enough with GA to be able to judge how much else is transmitted to them.
I guess I'm just very suspicious when personal data crosses borders.
EDIT - also wondering what you mean by a separate deal? If the data goes to the US it goes to the US and is then subject to US laws (and no longer subject to EU/UK protections, deal or no.
If I was a twitterer I might tweet about it too, but I'm not so I won't.
I've just (17:10 utc) at the source for http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/ and http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2012/10/16/gov-uk-the-st... there is only one occurrence of the string "google" in the page, and that is is link to a font called 'cabin':
<link rel='stylesheet' id='linen-accent-font-style-css' href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Cabin:bold type='text/css' media='all' />
Doesn't look like they are using google analytics to me, at least not now.
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-26179049-1']);
We're also referring to http://gov.uk, which is what the OP link refers to, not the OP link itself.