The first sentence of that post is:
> The Department of War has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement.
> The Department of War has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement.
Tomorrow he could change his mind to "we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement." the issue is that he wants Anthropic to change the use terms because "We will not let ANY company dictate the terms regarding how we make operational decisions."
>>no he didn’t he actually said the opposite of that and the link you just posted says the opposite of what you are claiming
>but he might change his mind!
Okay?
>Did the DoW ask for these things?
>Did the DoW ask for that?
I showed you where the spokeperson asked for the terms to change so they could make autonomous weapons. now, you're shifting the goal posts.
I'm torn here. Who should we believe? The normal people or the people who operate exclusively in dishonesty?
Is a pundit/politician lying to you a new experience?